The abandoned GRTC bus depot: past, present, and future

For over two years, the GRTC bus depot has been an abandoned eyesore to residents and visitors of the Fan and Carytown. Many have speculated about how the area could be redone to spur economic development, so why does the GRTC have no interest in selling it…at least not until 2016?  

The official date was December 2009–that’s when the Greater Richmond Transit Company (GRTC) moved its bus depot from the Fan to the South Side. The aged depot, a heap of crumbling brick and concrete that date backs to 1902, has sat undisturbed since. Many people believe that the structure has been outright ignored by the city and its public transportation provider.

“It is our responsibility to be a good community steward,” said Stephen McNally. He is a project administrator for the GRTC and the man in charge of the abandoned bus depot. He said that GRTC is “not currently trying to sell the property.” How is this serving as a good community steward? There’s actually a good explanation.

“This was here long before the Fan”

In the 1880’s, Richmond was a global first: the city owned and operated the first functional street railway. It was powered by horses. In May 1887, the city tasked New York City engineer Julian Sprague, a former assistant to Thomas Edison, to design a new electric trolley system.

In those days, the rail authority was the Virginia Passenger and Power Company, and in 1902, they completed construction of “trolley barns” in the present-day bus depot location near Robinson and Cary streets. “This was here long before the Fan,” said McNally while escorting me through the abandoned depot. The Fan District progressed with its developed through 1930, in large part because of the electric trolley system. Richmonders, once primarily relegated to the Downtown and Shockoe areas, were able to move west, and as a result the city grew.

By the end of World War II in 1945, bus lines began to replace trolley cars. On December 15, 1949, the last trolley car to run (No. 408) was burned during a ceremony. The former “trolley barn” at Robinson and Cary became a bus-only depot.

In 1973, the bus company became the GRTC. It is currently owned by the city of Richmond and Chesterfield County. In late 2009, the bus depot was abandoned for a new South Side site. This brings us to the question: what’s going to happen with the old bus depot?

“It takes time”

To understand the site’s future you have to understand its past. Think: for over 100 years, the depot harbored trolleys and buses. Decades of painting, reupholstery, and engines repair work was done on site—it was the bowels of the Richmond public transportation system. And things tend to spill and leak–from oil to transmission fluid, the foundations of the property are steeped in both history and viscous liquids.

“I performed a very detailed” site study of the 6.8-acre property, said McNally, who lived in Texas before moving to Richmond. While many clamor for the GRTC to sell the location to developers, few are unaware of the legal implications at stake. There are both federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the state’s Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) laws that the GRTC cannot ignore. “It’s too early,” said McNally, to “start pursuing sale of the property.” The reason: liability.

Should GRTC sell the property before a systematic appraisal and cleansing, it faces the possibility of incurring fines and even criminal prosecution from the EPA and/or DEQ. In other words: the GRTC is legally on the hook for any environmental issues as a result of their operation on the property.

As a result, the GRTC is taking time to clean and ready the site for sale. As we walked through abandoned buildings where buses were once painted and repaired, and remnants of trolley rails lie, he also pointed out several new additions to the property.

There are rods in various buildings that extend down twenty feet to measure the soil. Also, under orange traffic cones, are devices that constantly measure specific types of vapor–to make sure that they are not unhealthy.

McNally said that beginning sometime in June, workers will begin the “removal of underground and above-ground storage tanks” that once housed oil and fuel. The process is expected to last into September. Not only will the tanks be removed, but they will be removed while minimizing damage to the historical property. McNally said that there are short-term methods to ready the site for sale, however, they are “not guaranteed to recover the product by regulatory methods.” To do so properly, he said, “takes time.”

McNally estimates that it will take approximately four years to ready the property. Sometime in 2016, the GRTC will entertain offers on property, and they will likely have no shortage of interested buyers.

A ”Wide Swathe” of Potential Development

McNally underscored several times that the GRTC is “not interested in re-development.” They are not interested in redesigning the site. They are not interested in refurbishing the site. Their only interest is to bring the site up to legal environmental code so that they can sell the property. Whoever purchases it will have a lot to work with.

The property is zoned for business and mixed-use. The means that it could accommodate retail, commercial, and even residential uses. A “wide swathe of potential development,” said McNally. While how that property is developed is not the concern of the GRTC, getting the most for it is. “Our primary goal is getting the most dollars out of this asset.”

Before the cleaning process begins its first project, the bus depot has taken on another role.

The GRTC has rented space on the property to local restaurants for staff parking. At the behest of McNally and the GRTC, local restaurants have signed contracts stipulating that the GRTC is not responsible for any potential damage or injury. “The biggest concern for us is liability and vandalism,” said McNally. When asked about using the property for other public ventures while it’s cleaned—such as hosting a food cart pod, for instance—McNally responds with a question of his own: How would the GRTC be protected from liability? The answer: it wouldn’t. Every entrant onto the property would have to sign a waiver relieving the GRTC of liability if they were injured in any way. It’s just not feasible, even though McNally said it’s a, theoretically-speaking, good idea.

McNally sympathizes with those who want the abandoned bus depot gone, no longer blighting the Fan. But he maintained that it’s better for the GRTC, the city, and the area for the cleaning to be done thoroughly and properly before it’s sold to a developer. After which, he envisions it being a boon for the city. “It has a high potential.”

Related

  • error

    Report an error

Nathan Cushing

Nathan Cushing is a writer, journalist, and RVANews Editor.

Notice: Comments that are not conducive to an interesting and thoughtful conversation may be removed at the editor’s discretion.

  1. Mark on said:

    Thanks for this article. I have been wondering about the progression of this site for months.

  2. Christopher W on said:

    Assuring to know the proper patience and procedures will be followed. Can’t wait to see the ultimate fate of this location

  3. James on said:
  4. Nice work Nathan, you beat me to the finish line on this one. I have a Why Richmond, Why?!? for Monday on this site.

  5. Danny on said:

    Why not build a skatepark here? come on Richmond, get with it…Bedford has a skatepark, Norfolk has a skatepark, Va Beach is getting another skatepark, and Woodbridge just finished building a skatepark…It’s about time Richmond!!!!

  6. Stephen on said:

    Great article – thanks for the scoop.

  7. Mark on said:

    Sounds like GRTC wants the property to sit there and drain revenue because it’s probably good for their taxes hah.

  8. FredInRVA on said:

    @Mark, GRTC is a non-profit corporation owned by two local governments. As such, they don’t pay taxes.

  9. Trollolo on said:

    Danny, let’s differentiate Richmond with a rollerblade park.

  10. Dan C on said:

    One of the best-written RVANews articles I’ve read…kudos. As to a skatepark: if you read the article, there’s a legal liability issue with anyone present on the site.

  11. RobinsonSt on said:

    How did it take nearly 3 years for work to start the cleanup? In 2009, GRTC said environmental cleanup would take 6 months and then they kicked the ball around by supposedly selling it to RRHA, which never happened.

    GRTC knew they were leaving over 7 years ago, and it’s obviously there was no planning undertaken regarding how to handle the old location. I appreciate Mr McNally’s attention to detail, but as someone who has lived next to this facility for over 7 years now, it’s very frustrating.

  12. Phil on said:

    I kinda wish we could just bring the trolleys back.

  13. It’s too bad the Mayor, with an assist by Marty Jewell, has dragged his feet on this. More than 3 years on in his administration and his crowning achievement has been a new city jail. Meanwhile important projects like the fate of City Stadium, the future of the Trolley Barn, the redevelopment of pulic housing and much more lie on the back shelf. So much time wasted by this Mayor and the last. When the citizens were sold on the new city charater they bought a bill of goods.

  14. I want that door from Picture #4.

  15. Perhaps we could just purchase a giant shroud for it. It could even be printed with a picture of an English castle or something to hide the blight.

  16. Michael Dodson on said:

    WHY is one barn FULL of GRTC buses again, has been for two weeks now!!! Drive by it everyday. GRTC tow truck was on the property this morning.

  17. W. Henry Winston on said:

    Excellent article! My house is a block away from the GRTC bus barns. I’ve lived here for nearly 20 years and I certainly don’t mind waiting another 4 or 5 years in order for proper remediation to be achieved before the sale and development. Scott Bass, editor of a silly weekly local rag which I won’t name, printed a cover story this week stating that this project “can be developed within 3 or 4 years.” He also implies that the slow development of this and other city projects may be in part due to resistance from local neighbors. I am glad there are folks in charge of this project who know what they are doing.

  18. Shannon C. on said:

    PARKING DECK! If there’s one thing the Fan needs, it’s extra car slots.

  19. Scott on said:

    It seems to me the best use would be residential, retail and commercial development. It is logical to assume that the adjoining properties will become more desirable and potential buyers will be more interested in buying and renovating nearby properties. If the GRTC’s timeline is accurate, it will realistically be 2018 before any significant change is seen. I wish we didn’t have to wait so long but I can appreciate the care being taken.

  20. Mike on said:

    OK, 11 months later and look at all the progress that has been made….Wait, never mind. This article states that” McNally said that beginning sometime in June, workers will begin the “removal of underground and above-ground storage tanks” ” now unless they are doing this under the cover of darkness, nothing is happening. Now I don’t mind waiting for it to be done right, this in Richmond after all and you get used to waiting, but to see zero progress is disconcerting. Also, it’s been almost a year and no one seems to be asking questions about it anymore. Is the 3-4 year timeline still in place? That would make it 2-3 years from now. What’s the status??

  21. Mike on said:

    OK, sorry, I did find some evidence of work being done. But I still stand by my overall message that it would be nice to hear more news and updates about the status of the work. You hear more updates about restaurants being opened than you do about this. I drive/walk by the place several times a day and I just think there would be more activity. So again, What’s the status?.

  22. kylan on said:

    A follow-up interview with McNally would be great… no doubt it looks and sounds like nothing is happening on the site.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with an asterisk (*).

Or report an error instead