City Council recap: Monroe Park & ‘Birth of a Nation’

Last night’s city council meeting became a debate on two hot topics currently affecting the Richmond area: renovations of Monroe Park and the American Civil War Center’s attempts to sponsor a screening of the controversial film The Birth of a Nation.

Last night’s City Council meeting became a debate on two hot topics currently affecting the Richmond area. The long-discussed renovations of Monroe Park were heatedly disputed by community members and council members alike. Shortly thereafter, the American Civil War Center’s attempts to sponsor a screening of the controversial film Birth of a Nation brought up issues regarding freedom of speech.

After regular agenda items, payments of services owed, and position appointments were either approved or continued to future meetings, the public comment period opened up.

Jennifer Lawhorne from the campaign to Keep Monroe Park Open and Free approached the podium. She took issue with the Monroe Park renovation master plan in several areas.

After explaining the estimated cost of the first year of construction to be over $750,000 in the first year, and over $1 million by the fifth year, Lawhorne expressed fear that the public park’s overall expenditure would be inequitable to the rest of Richmond City Parks.

“The cost of maintaining Monroe Park should be equal to the cost of the rest of Richmond City Parks,” she said.

Lawhorne went on to explain, by her math, the total budget of all Richmond City Park’s is $14.6 million a year, covering 2440 acres — about $6,000 an acre. The new master plan for Monroe would cost $93,000 an acre.

She also feared the use of private companies in the maintenance and security of the park.

“We are asking of any mention of privatization be removed from the plan, and the park remain under control of Richmond City.”

2nd District Councilman Charles Samuels (pictured above), who has taken much of the heat for the proposed renovations, spoke up in the plans defense. “There’s been a lot of confusion out there,” he said. “There will not be a private company running Monroe Park… The master plan recommends a non-profit conservancy, not unlike Maymont.”

He also stressed his commitment to listening to those concerned with the plan saying he was in contact with administration and advisory board folks to make sure he heard the unease. Finally, he looked toward City Council President Kathy Graziano and assured her, “At the end of the day, once you hear both sides of the story, I think it will be a little different than what you just heard tonight.”

Speaking with 5th District Councilman Marty Jewell (pictured above) after the meeting presented a different view point from the council. “Monroe park is and has always been a public park, and it should remain a public park,” said Jewell, who has been seen attending some of the charity events held every Sunday in Monroe park. He said he sympathized with those involved in helping the homeless who come to Monroe Park for food and shelter.

“If you look at the master plan wordage from [the year] 2000, the language was there that we need to ‘reduce the visibility of homeless people,’” he said. “That’s always been the intent of certain corporate types who simply don’t want to see poor people.”

No part of the plan was to be voted on that night, so no issues concerning the park or the master plan were directly addressed in the meeting.

Soon after the Monroe Park conversation ended, 3rd District Councilman Chris Hilbert (pictured above) brought forth a resolution concerning the Richmond-based American Civil War Center’s attempt to sponsor a screening of the film Birth of a Nation.

The 1915 film based on the book The Clansman: An Historical Romance of the Ku Klux Klan by Thomas Dixon, is renowned in the film world for being one of the earliest examples of extensive film editing, as well as its use of grand cinematography to show a romantic view of the south during the Civil War. It also portrays the use of slaves and lynching as acceptable and common place. The Richmond Free Press brought the issue to light in an article earlier this week. Hilbert’s response came in the form of a resolution to “strongly discourage” the center from seeking additional sponsorship.

“If they want to show it there as historical fact, then that’s one thing, but to show this in a sponsored event and in a movie theater and get everyone to come out for it,” said Hilbert, “We need to move forward with our city.”

However, 1st District Councilman Bruce Tyler (pictured in the main image of this story) brought up the fact that it was not City Council’s job to be a censor.

“There is nothing in this film that I wanna see or have shown,” said Tyler, “But I have to sit here and say that freedom of speech is what makes our country great, and i don’t think its our right to censor freedom of speech.”

The resolution to discourage the organization from further pursuing the film’s screening was passed by a majority vote: Jewell, Graziano, Hilbert, Newbille, Robertson, and Connors voted yes; Tyler voted no; Samuels abstained; and Trammell was excused (not present for the vote).

(All photos by John Garcia)

  • error

    Report an error

Brad Kutner

Brad Kutner is a freelance journalist living in the Bellevue neighborhood of Richmond’s Northside. He is a regular contributor to Pacifica’s Free Speech Radio News, and is a volunteer manager with WRIR 97.3 LP-FM. He specializes in reporting on local politics and the environment, but spends most of his time looking at food blogs with his tiny dog in his lap.

14 comments on City Council recap: Monroe Park & ‘Birth of a Nation’

  1. anonymous on said:

    Hmmm….”certain corporate types”

    And VCU looks away and plays with their thumbs….

  2. I appreciate your coverage! Keep up the good work keeping us in the know!

  3. lindsey on said:

    maybe we could spend a million dollars helping the poor and homeless in monroe park instead of trying to put them out of sight and out of mind?

  4. Keep the reporting of the Monroe Park issue going! Thank you!

  5. Allen Harrelson on said:

    City Council would ALL vote against this, if they ate nothing for two days, then slept outdoors, in this weather, for just one night!

  6. Rvafan on said:

    Nice addition to the RVA News site! It would be nice to link to the Counci Agenda and minutes too.

  7. Great suggestion!

  8. Fortunately Allen, there are meals provided throughout the city everyday and no one, by law, sleeps in Monroe Park overnight. On days like today, no one, not even the poor or homeless spends time there..

  9. re: “Birth of a Nation”, wouldn’t you like to see this film for yourself to see how and why a brilliant filmmaker turned portrayed the KKK as heroes? Interestingly, the push back on this film was such that his next film was called “Tolerance”. I think a film historian could put these films into perspective and teach us a little bit about the times they were made in.. Now thanks to Ray Boone and others, no one will get a chance to see them.

    Glad to see the city council protecting our rights. Maybe next they’ll start censoring the VMFA .

  10. Christina Newton on said:

    Regarding the American Civil War Center’s plan to screen the film “Birth of a Nation”, City Council has no right to make such declarations and decisions on programming plans of our local nonprofits (and especially those that partner with the National Park Service.) Councilman Hilbert’s resolution is based on misunderstandings of the film and its historical significance.

    Art is our greatest record of human history, which is but one reason why D.W. Griffin’s work is a requirement of basic film and historical study. It may seem to some that censoring exposure to uncomfortable works of art is a gesture of compassion, but in fact, only limits our understanding of our past and removes an opportunity for contemplation. Situations such as this, or the controversial removal of contemporary artist David Wojnarowicz’s video “A Fire in My Belly” from the Smithsonian or the altering of Mark Twain’s classic “Huckleberry Finn”, only contribute to spreading ignorance and misinformation.

    Deleting history doesn’t serve us now nor in the future. We must learn from our past so that we may not repeat it. I applaud the American Civil War Center for taking on the presentation of such thought provoking efforts and wish them and their various partners success as they embark on the difficult work of presenting the legacy of the Civil War at its 150th anniversary.

  11. Roger Ebert has an excellent — if verbose — review of the film. Worth reading:

    http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20030330/REVIEWS08/303300301/1023

  12. Please forgive the typo of Griffith.

    Good link Ross.

  13. Allen Harrelson on said:

    Paul,
    I was there today, and last Sunday as well. I didn’t say that council should sleep IN the Park, I said OUTDOORS. You should learn to read.

  14. Blake Stack on said:

    Thanks for the write up. Great work with pic’s – a great addition.

    re: Monroe park – did anyone ever consider the fact that keeping the park the way it is could be more detrimental to the well being of the those experiencing poverty? I think we need to be critical of peoples intentions; however, a park is not the best place for people who are in need of immediate and urgent care (food, shelter, etc.). In the long run, people need places of respite that will surround them in supportive relationships, accountability, and access to sustainable resources. People are doing great work in Monroe Park, and they should be applauded (i.e Food Not Bombs), but I’m not convinced these efforts are fostering long-term solutions.

    I could be wrong.

Leave a comment

Your comment may be held for moderation and may not appear until manually approved. Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with an asterisk (*).

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Or report an error instead