and if *they* win…
The presidential primaries are in full effect and we’re getting decent exposure to the main Democratic and Republican candidates. With this, for me, has come the understanding that there is one candidate on one side that I like a lot, and that conversely there is another candidate on the other side that I don’t think […]
The presidential primaries are in full effect and we’re getting decent exposure to the main Democratic and Republican candidates. With this, for me, has come the understanding that there is one candidate on one side that I like a lot, and that conversely there is another candidate on the other side that I don’t think would completely drive me crazy if elected. The question is this: for you, who on the other side would be the least problematic if elected?
-
Recommend this
on Facebook -
Report an error
-
Subscribe to our
Weekly Digest
John Murden
John Murden covers Church Hill, the Fan, Carytown/Museum District , Northside, and random Richmond stuff for RVA News.
Notice: Comments that are not conducive to an interesting and thoughtful conversation may be removed at the editor’s discretion.
I don’t really have an affiliation so they are both kind of “the other side”. That said, or the field I would prefer to see Obama and McCain make it through. Of course that means it will be Clinton and Romney… the two I would not vote for if my life depended on it.
For me, the “other” is McCain. I don’t agree with much of his positions, but Romney and Guliani just seem awful to have to listen to opine for 4 or more years.
I’d say McCain too, but he’s just SO OLD.
I’m a registered Republican but I haven’t voted over there in a while. I’m for Ron Paul / Obama. But I’d vote for McCain out of the rest of the republicans I guess. His “we could be there for 100 more years” freaks me out a lot.