Patrick Henry School’s fate in question… again

The final act in the saga of the Patrick Henry School of Science and Arts charter school may well end with a hostage crisis at tonight’s Richmond School Board meeting. The Richmond School Board has indicated to Patrick Henry’s leaders that it will not approve hiring the school’s first principal, Pam Boyd, unless the charter’s leaders sign a lease that potentially dooms the school.

The final act in the saga of the Patrick Henry School of Science and Arts charter school may well end with a hostage crisis at tonight’s Richmond School Board meeting.

The Richmond School Board has indicated to Patrick Henry’s leaders that it will not approve hiring the school’s first principal, Pam Boyd, unless the charter’s leaders sign a lease that potentially dooms the school.

The deal-breaker portion of the lease proposal, on which district officials have so far been unwilling to budge, requires the charter to provide proof that it currently has full funding to complete nearly $1 million in renovations to the Patrick Henry building. Those renovations, as well as nearly $25 million in renovations to other Richmond schools, are required under a federal court settlement agreement compelling the district to finally comply with the 20-year-old federal Americans with Disabilities Act.

Patrick Henry spokeswoman Kristen Larson says the unfavorable lease amendments present a Catch-22 for the charter’s leaders.

On the one hand, with the school slated to open August 11, hiring Boyd is integral to ensuring new teachers are trained in the school’s unique curriculum when students arrive.

On the other hand, charter leaders have been informed by Self Help that it would no longer lend that money if the lease required financial guarantees for the remaining two renovation phases. Self Help, a national lender specializing in loans to high risk charter schools, had previously promised a loan of $200,000 toward the estimated $285,000 in renovations needed in phase one.

“In theory you could look at this and say signing it is saying we should have a million dollars right now – that’s how Self Help is looking at it,” Larson says. “And Self Help won’t give us the loan for phase one if these requirements are in the lease.”

Calls to Richmond Public Schools were not returned.

The School Board has good reason to seek assurances that the charter school has funding to complete its renovations. The district’s settlement agreement with a handful of plaintiffs who’d sued the district for violation of the ADA law sets rigid guidelines for renovating the district’s more than four-dozen school buildings to allow access for people with disabilities. It also requires new schools to be fully accessible at the time they open.

Violating that settlement agreement could come with stiff penalties imposed by the federal judge overseeing the settlement agreement. Prior to the School Board vote earlier this spring to approve Patrick Henry’s opening this year in a temporary space at Woodland Heights Baptist Church, the judge approved a plan to renovate Patrick Henry in three phases.

Now, it’s left to lawyers for Patrick Henry and the School Board to haggle over whether that approval required the phased renovations to happen in three years. Patrick Henry already has agreed to a three year construction timeline with school officials, but putting that in writing in the lease is the sticking point with Self Help.

The School Board had been scheduled to vote to approve Boyd’s hiring at its last meeting, but Patrick Henry representatives who attended that meeting were later told that deferring the hire was related to the lease.

School Board Chairwoman Kimberly Bridges and Patrick Henry president Deb Butterworth spoke by phone on Thursday night about the impasse. In a letter to Bridges, sent June 19, Butterworth asked that the board add a vote on Boyd’s appointment to its agenda for this evening.

Bridges did not return calls for comment.

It is unclear whether Boyd’s appointment has been added to the agenda — personnel matters are considered in closed session — and Larson says the school board has not responded to Butterworth’s June 19 letter, but has requested the Patrick Henry officials attend this evening’s meeting in case the board has questions.

The stakes tonight are simple, says Larson: “We need Boyd full time; that’s only five weeks before the school opens… And if we can’t get the loan, it all falls apart.”

  • error

    Report an error

Chris Dovi

Notice: Comments that are not conducive to an interesting and thoughtful conversation may be removed at the editor’s discretion.

  1. Mel on said:

    I’m confused and maybe someone can clue me in, but why is the Richmond School Board so against this charter school? It seems like they’re trying to kill it every chance they get? Is there a reason why they are against it?

    I’m really curious.

  2. Scott Burger on said:

    “The School Board has good reason to seek assurances that the charter school has funding to complete its renovations. The district’s settlement agreement with a handful of plaintiffs who’d sued the district for violation of the ADA law sets rigid guidelines for renovating the district’s more than four-dozen school buildings to allow access for people with disabilities. It also requires new schools to be fully accessible at the time they open.”

    The School Board has to be careful that it does not violate previous settlement.

    And this is where I chime in-

    While Richmond City Council gave Center Stage/VaPAF millions in public funding, it has not given RPS the funding it needs to quickly and convincingly fullfill the ADA settlement.

    5th District Councilperson Marty Jewell voted for the Center Stage/VaPAF deal, despite myself and other citizens warning him against it. All along, part of our argument to him was that the schools should come first. Sadly, Council joined him in ignoring us.

    And now, here we are. We still don’t know exaclty how much money Center Stage is losing because under the deal its finances are not discoverable under FOIA, and at the same time we have RPS struggling to fulfill the ADA settlement, with Patrick Henry as part of its struggle.

    I am not against Patrick Henry, but I do want to make people under the larger picture here. These downtown projects (now including the corporate push for a new Coliseum), have opportunity costs that can be measured in money and attention.

  3. Scott Burger on said:

    “I am not against Patrick Henry, but I do want to make people under the larger picture here.”

    Meant to write- “make people aware of the larger picture”

  4. Mary on said:

    This is not about complying with ADA settlement. That is a given, and ALREADY IN THE CHARTER AGREEMENT FOR PHSSA. This is about RPS superintendent and some school board members wanting to stop PHSSA from opening, any way they can. This time it is refusing to give the principal a contract (Va. law says employees of a charter school must be employees of the local education authority) until PHSSA signs a lease for PH building that would cause it to lose a very important loan for phase 1 of renovations.

  5. vanessa on said:

    All concerns/points aside. I am sure they are all good ones. The only thing I personally care about at this exact moment, is if this doesn’t happen I have no place to send my child. I gave up his spot in the lottery for fox once, we believed, this was a done deal. Now 6 weeks before he is to start school, he may not have one. Really? Is that a joke. How can that even be.

    So if there is anyone that can explain to me how less than 2 months before a school is to open, the school board whips out another road block, possilbly ending the school…how that can happen… I am all ears.

  6. CSB on said:

    This is why people move to Henrico & Chesterfield.

  7. Liberty on said:

    so richmond public schools can be non-compliant with the ada law but the charter school cant. do as i say not as i do, thats a good mantra for an educator, keep up the good work school board

  8. Kate Falcon on said:

    The lapdogs of Supt. Brandon continue to take hypocrisy to unprecedented levels. Why do they keep jerking this little charter school around? What do they have to fear?

    I find it reprehensible that they continue to try to play the ADA parents against the PHSSA parents. When will the School Board and administration learn that we all want the same thing — schools that are inclusive and excellent schools for our city?

    Wouldn’t it be great if they would stop the nonsense and get serious about fixing these schools — ALL of our schools?

  9. Mary on said:
  10. Ian on said:

    Crap like this makes me want to support charter schools even more. We need to get the bureaucrats and numb skulls out of education.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with an asterisk (*).

Or report an error instead