Editorial: 50 questions for the RPS School Board
50 questions for the School Board in light of their 5-to-4 vote to close Clark Springs Elementary School and radically redistrict Cary Elementary School.
The following was posted as a comment on our primer on rezoning and school closing.
By Adria Scharf & Thad Williamson
At the 11th hour, the Richmond Public School board has voted on a 5-to-4 vote to close Clark Springs Elementary School and radically redistrict Cary Elementary School, with a plan that will overall affect 20% of the district’s elementary school children. It will also affect Adult Career Development Center, Norrell pre-K, and the Thirteen Acres program for emotionally disabled children.
This decision has been made without members having the correct data to assess the impact of this change on families, schools, and racial integration in the school district.
The next two School Board public hearings on the proposals to rezone and close schools are scheduled for these dates:
- May 28, 5:30 PM • Thomas Jefferson High School (4100 W. Grace Street)
- June 3, 5:00 PM • City Hall City Council Chambers (900 E. Broad Street)
In addition, here are the emails of school board members. The advocates of the rushed rezoning and school closure plan are the first five individuals listed. Please share your thoughts with them and the other school board members:
glen.sturtevant@gmail.com, kgray@richmond.k12.va.usv, jbourne@richmond.k12.va.us, klarson@richmond.k12.va.us, djones15@richmond.k12.va.us, mtaylor4@richmond.k12.va.us, smuhamme@richmond.k12.va.us, teppes@richmond.k12.va.us, dcoleman2@richmond.k12.va.us
If you care about the children of this city, make your voices heard.
— ∮∮∮ —
- Best practice guidelines issued by the state of California regarding school closure decisions state that “The decision to close a school must be based upon hard, empirical evidence that leads to a broadly supported, incontrovertible conclusion-the district cannot afford to keep a particular school(s) open without cuts elsewhere (budget, staffing, etc.).” This is also common sense. How then can the board majority approve a rezoning and closure plan when by everyone’s admission, correct data on its demographic consequences have not been made available?
- Put it another way, how can you vote for a plan without knowing all its consequences?
- Why is Clark Springs, a school with test scores higher than the district average and with outstanding performance on the 2012 Math SOLs (PDF), targeted for closure?
- How much money will be saved by closing Clark Springs?
- How many of the board members voting for the proposals have visited Clark Springs and the surrounding neighborhood?
- How many of the board members voting for the proposal have otherwise spoken with the principal or staff there to discuss the school’s strengths and weaknesses?
- How many of the board members voting for the proposal know the name of the principal at Clark Springs? Are board members aware she is also the principal for the Maymont pre-K program? How will closing Clark Springs impact Maymont?
- Are board members voting for the proposal aware that Clark Springs has just over $140,000 of identified infrastructure needs, far less than most other schools in the district?
- Are board members voting for the proposal confident that all the students now at Clark Springs will be moving into a better academic and social environment at their new school? If so, on what basis? If not, on what moral basis do they justify harming the academic and social development of the children at Clark Springs?
- How many of the board members voting for the proposal are aware of the Thirteen Acres program for emotionally disturbed children at Clark Springs?
- How many of the board members voting for the proposal have visited that program or spoken with its leadership to assess how well it is faring in the Clark Springs context?
- How many of the board members voting for the proposal have begun thinking about where an alternative location for Thirteen Acres might be?
- If so, what is that location? Does that location provide for all the needs of Thirteen Acres children as well as or better than the Clark Springs site?
- Are the board members voting for the proposal aware of research demonstrating the importance of stability, and the damaging impact of instability, on children who have suffered trauma or abuse, such as many of the children at Thirteen Acres?
- Do the school board members voting for this proposal believe that hastily cobbling together a transition plan for Thirteen Acres does adequate justice to the children in the program, and shows respect for their needs and development? Are they willing to explain in person to the parents and caregivers of Thirteen Acres students why moving the program precipitously is an absolutely necessary step?
- Has the school board identified an alternative location for the pre-K center now located at Norrell? Does this location meet the needs of the program as well as or better than the Norrell site?
- What is the status of the restructured CCP program? What building will this program go to? How is the transition process for that program going? Is the board confident that the transition will be seamlessly completed over the summer?
- Where will the services and program now located at the Adult Career Development Center be provided?
- Will it be located somewhere easily accessible by GRTC?
- Will the new space allow room for future expansion of these critical programs?
- Is planning for the relocated ACDC being undertaken in coordination with other city agencies working on workforce development?
- Why has the board chosen to move all Clark Springs students south of I-195 to Cary, including those who live geographically closer to Fox, while moving all Cary students north of I-195 to Fox, including those who live geographically closer to Cary?
- Are the members voting for this proposal aware that numerous families at Cary living north of I-195 are already invested in Cary?
- Do the members voting for this proposal assume that residents on Grayland, Parkwood and other streets in Cartytown South prefer to be in Fox rather than Cary? On what basis do they make this assumption? Have they asked, or provided adequate opportunity to disseminate the proposal?
- Why does the board favor a redistricting option that is likely to decrease the proportion of black students at Fox at the same time it increases the proportion of black students at Cary, thereby heightening the racial polarization between the two neighborhood schools?
- Why does the board favor a redistricting option that very substantially increases the proportion of children in poverty at Cary (from 50% to 74%), while at the same time leaving the percentage of low-income students at Fox under 20%, compared to a system-wide average of 71%?
- Why is the school board undercutting Cary at a time it is showing potential to develop into truly racially and class integrated school, similar to Linwood Holton (PDF)?
- Is the school board aware that the proportion of white student at Cary increased from 12.5% to 20% from 2011-12 to 2012-13?
- Is the school board aware that 40% of current kindergartners at Cary are white?
- If so, why is the school board pulling the plug now on the possibility of Cary continuing to emerge in years to come as a strong, high-performing diverse school by removing all students north of I-195?
- Have any school board members engaged in disparaging remarks or communications about Cary or any other school in RPS, beyond purely factual, data-based observations? If so, do they believe this is an appropriate way to talk about other schools in the system, given it is the board’s responsibility to promote education in all schools?
- Have all the school board members voting for this proposal visited Cary and spoken with its principal? Have they taken the opportunity to speak with the principal directly about any concerns they may have with the school?
- Is this board committed to offering an excellent education to students in all schools, or is it planning to offer a top tier education to students in the Fox and Munford zones while treating other schools as second or third-tier? If not, why is it packing as many white middle-class families as possible into Fox under this plan?
- Is this board comfortable with providing final approval to a plan before many parents are aware of what the plan actually does? Why is it being proposed to spend money on an education and PR campaign for the proposed changes after the fact, rather than before the fact?
- Why are board members claiming that everything in the plan has been discussed before, when the total package in plan C (PDF) has only been available for two weeks? Do they not understand that talking about individual issues in isolation is not the same thing as talking about a complete plan that has several moving parts?
- How much time has this board spent deliberating this proposal? What alternative has it been compared to?
- Does the board think it is good policymaking process to deliberate on a proposal when the most basic demographic data on the proposal’s consequences have not been presented?
- Does the board think that after school closures have been pushed through on a 5-4 basis, everyone is just going to get along again and there will be no hard feelings in the future?
- Does the school board have in mind strong superintendent candidates who are eager to work for a board that is divided on a 5-4 basis?
- What plan is envisioned to merge Clark Springs and Cary Elementary schools? What process for staff assignment will be used? Who will be responsible for carrying it out? What additional support would be provided to help the merger go well?
- Is the school board aware that the foundation of academically successful schools in urban settings is a strong school culture, a critical piece of which is the relationship between the principal and the teachers? If so, wouldn’t it make more sense for the Cary principal and potential new staff at Clark Springs to have already begun building a relationship and have plenty of lead time in planning a good transition so the school is ready to go on day one?
- Is the school board confident in adequately carrying out all the logistical operations involved in moving schools, including moving furniture, books and supplies, figuring out what needs to go where, reorganizing space at schools accepting new students, and the like? Who in RPS will be responsible for overseeing this process?
- Are school board officials confident that at this late point this merger will proceed without substantial chaos and confusion? Are they aware that a chaotic start to a new school could damage the school long-term?
- Who in RPS will be held accountable for the success of moving Norell Pre-K, the ACDC, Thirteen Acres, and the CCP, as well as merging Clark Springs, over the next two and half months, given there is no Acting Superintendent?
- Is the School Board confident it can monitor all these tasks well at the same time it plans to hire a new permanent superintendent?
- What is the plan for treatment of out-of-zone students whose schools will exceed capacity due to the proposed changes? Fox is projected to be at 120% capacity, without counting current private school students who may choose to move to Fox after rezoning.
- Is the board assuring families that all students now enrolled in a school, or admitted for next year out of-zone, will be guaranteed a slot at that school?
- If not, are board members willing to personally field calls from parents whose school assignment will now be changed?
- Do school board members believe that head of enrollment services Harry Morgan knew what he was talking about when he called changing attendance zones after the closure of open enrollment a “train wreck waiting to happen” at the May 20 meeting? If not, why not?
- Do school board members believe this process of rushing through school closures on a 5-4 vote without adequately considering the consequences, without planning thoroughly for the transitions involved, is a good example to the community? Is this really the best we can do in Richmond in 2013?
-
Recommend this
on Facebook -
Report an error
-
Subscribe to our
Weekly Digest
Notice: Comments that are not conducive to an interesting and thoughtful conversation may be removed at the editor’s discretion.
All important questions…with 23 through 34 being the most important in my opinion. The fact that this rare opportunity to slightly desegregate some of our schools is being used to do just the opposite is unbelievable to me. I hope the board has some answers tonight.
Cary is over half empty. Of the few enrolled, how many students are from in zone? There are good questions here and I understand how the writers are invested in Cary but why are the students at Cary entitled to be supported in a half empty school while other schools are busting at the seams? My question to the writers: how would you increase enrollment at Cary?
I’m not really sure how or why the “close” focus shifted from John B. Cary, which I understood to be the least utilized school in the entire RPS system, to Clark Springs. Somehow, John B. Cary got taken off the close list and Clark Springs substituted. It seems to me the appropriate approach, if the School Board was going to close an elementary school, would have been to close John B. Cary, which had been identified in the previous closure analysis as the No. 1 recommended school for closure in each of the earlier, exhaustively evaluated plans. What changed? How did Clark Springs get substituted for John B. Cary?
Thank you Adria and Thad! AND according to VDOE data RPS has had a 5.7% K-5 enrollment INCREASE compared to 4 years ago. RPS website data is not accurate – example: Patrick Henry charter not even included. What we have is a trend of INCREASING k-5 enrollment in this city. Let’s not screw it up.
Several areas are hoping for the new zoning. Fisher and Bellevue’s enrollment will increase thus take them off the chopping block. The neighborhoods around Westover Hills can’t wait to get involved. Woodland Heights is ready to join Westover Hills. Norrell is on a toxic dump. Activists and neighbors have been protesting sending preschoolers there from the get go. I don’t think CCP is on the chopping block, although something needs to be done because the for profit company that runs the school has failed to do their job and cost more than the public school running it. Thirteen Acres only needs two rooms at Cary that is what I was told. How many Clark Springs families object to going to Cary? When my children attended Cary, many Clark Springs students were there through open enrollment. Go here for stats on RPS 2011-2012. Only 199 students at Cary.
Also here is a good comment a parent involved in several Richmond Public Schools left on a thread: “How are we to attract the best teachers if we are unable to pay them a fair wage? Operating a school system with so many empty seats drastically reduces the amount of state and federal dollars. This requires our locality to pick up the tab…which then drastically reduces any opportunity to fund more than just the bare bones education. Combining schools to increase our ADM/capacity ratio goes to maximize the amount of state and federal funding – and hopefully creating opportunity to expand our course offerings, return athletics to all buildings, pay our teachers a decent wage, provide meaningful professional development and build schools that can effectively meet the needs of their community, just to name a few.”
“How are we to attract the best teachers if we are unable to pay them a fair wage? Operating a school system with so many empty seats drastically reduces the amount of state and federal dollars. This requires our locality to pick up the tab…which then drastically reduces any opportunity to fund more than just the bare bones education. Combining schools to increase our ADM/capacity ratio goes to maximize the amount of state and federal funding – and hopefully creating opportunity to expand our course offerings, return athletics to all buildings, pay our teachers a decent wage, provide meaningful professional development and build schools that can effectively meet the needs of their community, just to name a few.”
Here are the 2011-2012 stats for Richmond Public Schools. Scroll down to find the elementary school list http://web.richmond.k12.va.us/AboutRPS/Statistics/Ethnic2012.aspx
I’m sorry, neighborhood 1st, but to conceptualize the 13 Acres program as simply about “moving two classrooms” is deeply off-base and shows precisely what these questions are getting at, a lack of engagement with the details on the ground. This is what the former director of exceptional education for RPS, Harley Tomey, said about 13 Acres in a document distributed to the School Board recently:
“13 Acres is Richmond Public School’s only elementary public day program for students with emotional disabilities. This move must take into consideration the space needed to ensure that this specialized program operates effectively. The space needs include classrooms, behavioral support/counseling rooms, team meeting space, and administrative space. The middle school for this program, REAL School, is currently located at Henderson Middle School. This move is not just simply moving two classrooms to another building.”
Simply put, you don’t move kids in this population around without a lot of careful thought and planning.
Re Cary, its enrollment for this year is at 207 and everyone agrees that should increase. That enrollment would be higher immediately if the board restored transportation for open enrollment students because the school traditionally has gotten many students out of zone. Increasing the boundaries a few blocks to the east is another way to go. And the school’s internal plan has been to transition to a K-8 school. What this plan does is actually take students OUT of Cary.
Re whether this saves money, this is very unclear. The ACDC building may still be open if they move CCP there. And those programs still have to be put somewhere. Likewise, Norrell has to be somewhere. And so does 13 Acres. Plus Maymont will still need a principal. No one has yet produced an itemized account of how much money all this will actually save.
I understand you like the southside zoning proposals. We have concerns about those, but they aren’t the focus of these questions. But the southside zoning is logically independent of what is being done with Clark Springs/Cary/Fox, as well as the timing of these moves. The Board could choose to go with the southside rezoning without making these other, fundamentally unrelated moves. I wish though that those who are partisans for Westover Hills rezoning would realize there is a much bigger picture to consider, including the two biggest questions of all: the level of analysis and planning that goes into these highly consequential decisions, and also the way that the school districts treats people, including staff. Think about what it would be like to be a teacher or family highly invested in a school like Clark Springs, that has made great strides with a challenging high-poverty demographic, and be told on short notice for unclear reasons that your school is being closed.
Neighborhoods are great, but they are not the be-all and end-all. Solidarity and concern for RPS children needs to extend beyond particular neighborhood concerns. Personally, I refuse to live in a community that makes decisions like this with so little analysis and with so little chance of being implemented smoothly in a way that respects people, without at least saying something about it.
The out of zone transportation will not be restored anytime soon given the track record of one year after another of school budget cuts. As it is, busses don’t pick up the kids in zone. Transportation has been hell in the past year perhaps due to last year budget cuts when they laid off transportation workers. We can’t afford to lay off anymore RPS workers, we are down to bare bones and our kids are suffering for it and we won’t be finding hidden staff in some warehouse like we did the computers years ago. The shortage of staff in every department is real. If Cary wishes to keep things the same with such low enrollment then they will have to become a specialty bubble school like Open and Community. My own children are enrolled in schools with a large population and a shortage of supplies and staff so I find this unfair. I know you all fear the poor coming into Cary but you are not paying attention to the working and middle classes very excited about the prospect of being zoned for Cary.
Also we don’t need middle school years at Cary. They are already zoned for the best middle school, Albert Hill. A k-8 program at Cary will not solve the middle school gap in our city. Funds for a middle school are best used in an area of great need.