City tree removal gains political attention
Even as the Ginter Park Residents’ Association educates North Richmonders about the care and maintenance of street trees, the Times-Dispatch reports on the city’s struggles to maintain its urban forest — and its penchant for thinning the treescape at a rapid clip: Something big was missing when Jamie Walters returned to her North Richmond home from […]
Even as the Ginter Park Residents’ Association educates North Richmonders about the care and maintenance of street trees, the Times-Dispatch reports on the city’s struggles to maintain its urban forest — and its penchant for thinning the treescape at a rapid clip:
Something big was missing when Jamie Walters returned to her North Richmond home from school one day early this year.
A patch of sawdust was all that was left of a large maple tree that had stood next to Newport Drive in front of her home. Two other maples had been spared only because a car was parked next to them, but they were marked for removal the next day.
That’s when Walters, a 16-year-old rising junior at Open High School, decided to take a stand. She and Caitlin Britton, a 17-year-old friend and classmate, got their parents’ permission to stay home from school the next day to protect the two remaining trees.
“All we could do was stand in front of the trees,” Walters said.
And that’s what they did, saving both trees from removal by the city’s urban forestry crew, which left after trimming several branches.
Walters and Britton aren’t alone in their concern that Richmond is too quick to cut down trees on public property, and too slow to plant trees to replenish the city’s thinning urban forest. The city reported last year that it is cutting 1,500 to 2,000 trees a year, while planting no more than 300.
-
Recommend this
on Facebook -
Report an error
-
Subscribe to our
Weekly Digest
This article has been closed to further comments.